[<b>CONTENT RECORD FOUND, BUT NO CONTENT AT ALL</b>]

Medical Malpractice Attorneys Birth Injury, Cerebral Palsy, Brain Damage, Erb's Palsy Law firm in Puerto Rico.

Our recent judgments / settlements

$9,200,000 settlement in Cynthia Soto v. Doctors' Center Hospital on June 26, 2024 for brain damaged child.
$6,000,000 jury verdict in Tiffany Escobar vs. Doctors' Center Hospital San Juan on April 11, 2024 for mild brain damaged boy with no physical injuries where defense alleged autism.
$6,200,000 total settlement in Maria Berrios vs. Hospital Menonita Guayama, Inc. on March 15, 2024.
$30 million approximate settlement pay-out in Municipality of San Juan vs. Johnson & Johnson on April 18, 2023 in a national Opioid mass tort class action.
Confidential Settlement agreement reached in a wrongful death case of an 80 year old upon filing of the case in Federal Court, October 2015.
Confidential Settlement agreement reached in an Erb's Palsy case while the jury was deliberating in Federal Court, February 2015.
$1,800,000 confidential settlement in brain damage case in Federal Court, September, 2006.
$2,000,000 verdict in shoulder distoxia case. Reported in Professional Negligence Law Reporter, March 2007; Muniz vs. Rovira 373 F.3d 1; 453 F.3d 10.
$1,900,000 settlement in eminent domain case, May 2007.
$4,500,000 confidential settlement in brain damage case in Federal Court, May 2008.
$2,500,000 confidential settlement in brain damage case in Federal Court, March 2009.

The United States Court of Appeals published opinion, 373 F.3d 1; regarding attorney David Efron's advocacy:

•"...review makes it abundantly clear that the plaintiff's counsel gave no quarter. He took full advantage of the sympathetic nature of his case and, on occasion, he sailed close to the wind. We find no indication, however, that counsel crossed the thin line that separates vigorous advocacy from impermissible appeals to passion or prejudice....we find no indication that improper rhetoric influenced the outcome of the trial.. There is a critical difference between a lawyer that hits hard and a lawyer that hits below the belt.....The plaintiff's opening statement and closing argument in this case both were hard-hitting, but neither was manifestly improper. "